1.-Antonio Machado said carrying inside drops of Jacobin blood, but already no matter what moves in arteries of the poets: is uncomfortable liquid anger coming from the dark ages which Brecht called natal, which are now at disguised as others. And Jean Rehoir claimed the blood of the Jacobin agitator Saint-just, a boy who two centuries ago, in three years of fury, put upside down to France before ( had 26 years ) the guillotine before which knelt down his adversaries will cut ( without a complaint, ) the neck. What there is in the blood of bloodthirsty gentle spirits to summon it as distinctive of elevation?Valle Inclán directs radios, televisions and newspapers and Montesquieu is front-page news, his wayward grandson, deserves shelter in a corner because under the asphalt of the end of Millennium can be heard still Crackle of the split of Europe following the speech of Saint-just, ( it had 23 years ) at the National Convention in November 1792. Being hotly discussed if, dethroned Luis XVI should be judged by Parliament or, as a citizen, by an ordinary court. The boy went up to the podium and her sharp voice broke through in the gibberish, leaving behind a terrified silence. From its mouth flowed this bleak punch of logic: " would judge a King as a citizen? Cold posterity is this too obvious madness a3ombrara: can not innocently rule " 2.-blood jacobinaEn our country want to replace selfishness with morals, honour by the honesty, the Customs principles, the tyranny of fashion by the domain of reason, contempt for misfortune by the contempt of Vice, the insolence by pride, vanity by the greatness of spirit, the love of money for the love of glorygood society by good people, intrigued by merit, the presumption by the intelligence, the appearance by the truth... And a flattering, frivolous and miserable people by a magnanimous, powerful and happy people ". It would be strange that at these words someone showed their disagreement, but more unusual even would listen to them today in the mouth of a large part of political leaders and public officials in whom we delegate our sovereign power. They are the words of one of the most controversial, and suggestive of contemporary Europe: Maximilien Robespierre. I found this text on the exciting novel by Javier García Sánchez, Robespierre, where over more than a thousand pages discusses the life and political career of the French revolutionary, and so usa memory and the memory of a literary character, Sebastian-François Precy of Landrieux and Duclos. I have not finished it yet, but this fictional story, with great respect to the 40 sources; just look at the Post scriptum, composed of about 200 pages where the treatment given to the biografiado in the historiography ) reviewed, I find it more attractive than the work of Peter McPhee research: Robespierre. A revolutionary life. Find me it easy to make the comparison because I've done a reading below the other.